Things “One-Housers” hope You never find out!

If you don’t already know, a “One-Houser” is someone who denies that there remains a Two House/Two Kingdom reality of Israel in modern times. They view “the Jews” as exclusively representing all 12 tribes of Israel. Their world-view/paradigm is basically opposite to that of a “Two-Houser”, which is better defined here: Two House Theology (Reality) defined and defended.

So here are some things “One-Housers” hope you never find out (you’ll rarely ever hear them mention these things when they accuse Two-Housers of “lies”, “error”, “heresy”, and/or “bad exegesis“):

Please Note: “Two-Housers” will one day be “One-Housers” also, but that transition will only take place after the-Anointed Son of David (Ha-Mashaikh ben Dawid) unites both Houses into One House, or One Stick as Ezekiel 37 prophesies He will do in the Last Days. We are in the Last Days, so that transition and this battle of world-views will be over SOON! Halleluyah!!

Related Content:

Using the DNA of Saka-related peoples to find the Lost 10 Tribes of Israel

Related content:

Genetics and Ancient History (especially Parthian-Saka-Scythian history) are extremely complicated and riddled with speculation and assumption on almost every level. Even so, the two fields of study are quickly becoming synergistic allies in the search and discovery of the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel.

Parthian-Saka-Scythic-related peoples are by far the most probable candidates for being descendant of those 10-Tribes of Israel scattered and deported by the Assyrian Empire between 740-722BCE. The list of reasons is too long to innumerate fully here, yet a short list of the thought pattern is provided below:

There is no doubt the founder of these peoples was a founder of a “multitude of nations”. The mysterious question is: Who was this Founder? We believe he wore a “Coat of Many Colors”!

This thought pattern is outlined in greater detail in Israelite and Noahic Haplogroup (DNA) Hypotheses.

Related Content:

Musings on the Two-House teaching found in the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy

I realize J.R.R. Tolkien may or may not have had an understanding of the Two House Reality, but knowing the time he lived and the prevalence of the Two-House understanding in much of the English court system (because of British-Israelism)… he likely did have some understanding in the realities of and differences in “Joseph/Ephraim” and “Judah” (the Jews).

What follows are simply my own observations and though I think Tolkien may have had some deliberation in these things, he repeatedly and adamantly insisted during his life that he didn’t inject any such comparisons or parallels into his Legendarium. Even so… I’m certain I’m not the first to see what follows.

If the parallels weren’t intended by Tolkien, then there is no reason to insist on a perfect parallel. But where the parallels do seem obvious, it is difficult for me to thumb my nose at them as if they are some accidental and/or trivial thing. Whatever the original intention, I find them all intriguing and a good teaching tool for those ignorant of the Two House reality.

If you have any added thoughts regarding this, please comment. Yet, please don’t just criticize where the parallels breakdown. We all should know no parallel is going to fit perfectly, especially since none were “officially” intended.

Defining the Two-House Reality:

The Republic of Sakha, ancient Israelite residue

Recently, I explored Russia’s eastern territories using Google Earth, and I gleefully came upon the Republic of Sakha. It is an enormous land mass north of Mongolia/China which is heavily populated by a people known as Sakha-Yakuts. Y Chromosomal Haplogroup N dominates their population (estimated to be more than 80% Hg. N). Y-Haplogroup Q is predominantly still found in the nearby Ket, Selkup, and Altay peoples centered around the Altai mountains. By the way, Scythian-Saka peoples lived all around the Altai mountainous region. Some of their royal burial mounds have been found there. This is interesting because Haplogroups Q, R, and N are found together frequently stretching from Europe to Siberia and many of those peoples claim descent from ancient Saka-Scythia.

So what caused my glee? I had absolutely no idea any name so closely resembling the ancient Saka still existed in modern Asian countries but I knew the Saka-Scythians extended near to this remote northeastern region during and after the Parthian period.

The modern Sakha speak a “so-called” Turkic family of languages that are predominatly spoken by, well Turkey, but also many Central Asian peoples. I might add, they’re all very near and surrounding the ancient Parthian Empire, and note, Josephus linked the Parthian-Saka multitude to the lost ten tribes of Israel (see Quotes by Flavius Josephus).

Interestingly, here is some evidence that even Native Americans (predominantly y-Haplogroup Q) also have Turkic linguistic connections. The article concludes with this: “Ancient Central Asiatic peoples, among them the ancestors of Turks, are known to have migrated from their homelands in steps of Central Asia and Siberia to east, west, north and south. It is also known that the Native peoples of Americas have migrated from Asia to their new homelands in the Americas thousands of years ago. However, in the known history, the ancestors of Turks and the ancestors of Native Peoples of Americas are not known to have made contact with each other. Yet in spite of this fact, it is surprising to see that Turkish, as a member of the Altaic languages, should have common living words with some of the native languages of Americas. The presence of these words in these languages can not be attributed to random and independent development of these languages in two widely separated continents. I believe their presence is a definite indication of the existence of linguistic and cultural kinship between the ancestors of Turks and the other Altaic peoples and the ancestors of some of the Native Peoples of Americas that they had while they were living in the steps of Central Asia and Siberia before they were separated some 10 000 or more years ago.”

Now, if we could just get our heads out of the butt of Oxford’s carbon-dating lab, we may start to see the Native Americans didn’t migrate to the America’s 10,000 years ago… although I realize that is a tall order, especially for the Priests of Evolution.

How long did it take Virginian settlers to migrate via horse and buggy to California? Hmmm… just more European-American bigotry to think it took Asian Hg. Q’s 10,000 years to migrate a similar distance from Siberia to the Americas? The Asian Q’s and C’s didn’t take one step forward, two steps back. I don’t know how many of you have experienced Canadian winters, but two steps backward isn’t an option. If they had any women in their ranks (and obviously they did), many chiefs were being nagged about the warm hope of Costa Rica and Brazil.

To end, I think this only scratches the surface of all the evidence for Israelite identities in the world today. It doesn’t take a ball room of Phd’s to link the account of Josephus to the Saka-Parthian multitude and the genetics of their descendant peoples in modern time.

A little miffed, but very excited at these connections. Thank you Google Earth!

~ Related Posts ~
Israelite Haplogroup (DNA) Hypotheses

Ephraim: Founder of Y-Chromosome Haplogroup P (Genesis 48:19, a multitude of nations)

~ External Links ~
Saka Connection Theories

The Israelite Origin of the Scythians

Israelite Migrations, European Origins, and Exponential Population Growth

One of the more prominent supporters (Steve Olson: author of Mapping Human History, 2002) for the Out-of-Africa Theory (60,000+ years ago), has shown that the current Global Population size could have been reached within 2,000 to 7,000 years. See the Fox News story which broke in July of 2006. I know it might be difficult for some to understand just how monumental this is, but it truly is HUGE!!

I first read of the development from this Anthropology.net blog:
Could the ancestor of every living human lived only 2000 years ago? (It is now a dead link. I can’t imagine why.)

Olson, Chang, and Rohde corroborated as mathematicians before Mapping Human History was published in 2002. I may be wrong in this assumption because there isn’t any firm dates published in the article. Regardless, it astounds me that this revelation doesn’t profoundly impact the haplogroup origination estimations (the “official” estimates for most all Haplogroups date well beyond 20,000 years ago). Asking the Priests of Evolution to question one of their most basic dogmas is no different than asking a Christian to question the existence of Jesus Christ.

The algorithm Olson’s team used to determine the population group was undoubtedly very complex (read the news article). But here is a great webpage where you can actually play with the different variables in a much simpler Population Growth Equation: Principles of Population Growth. I like to put the starting population variable at “8″ since that is what I believe was the population of Noah’s family. I use 4400 years as the timeframe variable since that is the approximate date of Noah’s Flood according to Bible “literalists” (such as myself) when observing the literal chronologies in the Bible. The “birth rate” variable is the one that has been the most unstable and explosive throughout human history because of wars, famines, etc… But even after giving a very low averaged birthrate of “1%” or “.01″, or even lower, you’ll be surprised how hasty the human population explodes over time. It is the powerful result of exponential mathematics. Put 65,000 years as the timeframe variable and see what you get. The resultant is ridiculous and even absurd, even with many negative “birth rate” periods being considered!!!!!!!

As a frame of reference, when you consider the one hundred years of population growth in the American states between say 1750 to 1850, the “birth rate” variable far exceeded 2% for the general population, which is why European migrant populations to America had so much success populating the North American continent. To think this modern event is isolated, would be foolish considering our previous rapid success in populating the continent of Europe.

I’m currently reading Steve Olson’s book (Mapping Human History) and it is certainly evident that he and Spencer Wells (author of Deep Ancestry: Inside the Genographic Project) tow the same (religious) party line, regarding the evolutionary time frames of human migrations. It simply astounds me when they state their numbers in “tens of thousands” of years when the phenomenon of population growth and actual migration history counter those claims. Spencer Wells himself calls the land mass from eastern France to Korea a “super-highway” in his recent book. In my mind, it isn’t so “super” if it took many thousands of years to travel it. Traders traveled it in matter of months and years, not thousands of years. The “Silk Road” is a wonderful example. Of course, they were just traders, but large populations have been known to migrate rapidly. They generally don’t migrate at once, unless driven to do so for food (i.e. the relatively recent Irish potato famine) or driven by other hostile invaders (i.e. Goth and Hun migrations).

Furthermore, it is believed Europe was sparsely (thinly) populated before the Great Migration Period (200-800 AD/CE). Now when looking at the overwhelming frequency of Haplogroups R, I, and N in Europe, we know they either completely wiped out the previous male population in the last 2,000 years or there were no large population at all before that, because of the immense population migration into Europe AFTER that time. Personally, I believe Haplogroup R arrived in Europe in at least two major migrations, one by sea and one prolonged settlement migration by land), which seems to be confirmed by two separate mitochondrial (female) migration arrivals in Western Europe (one by sea / one by land).

First speculative migration: About 3,000 years ago (during and after the life of King David), Israel, Phoenicia, and Egypt were in a maritime alliance. They would go on sea-trade voyages together that would last three years in length and were then repeated after returning home (I Kings 10:21-24). Because Britannia (Britain) and Iberia (Spain) had numerous mineral resources needed back in the Levant and Nile regions, it is believed the Phoenician alliance likely settled those not so “far-off” lands in order to mine Tin, Silver, Copper, etc needed in their homeland building and war pursuits. According to the Bible, we know Israel, Phoenicia, and Egypt intermarried extensively (their respective royal families intermarried for the same reasons European royalty did so in the Middle Ages). In the case of Phoenicia and Israel, they even spoke a very similar, if not the exact same language during the time of David and Solomon. Tyre and Sidon (Phoenicia) neighbored Israeli territory in the north and reportedly inter-married (I Kings 7:13-14), probably more than what pleased the Elohim of Israel (Hosea 7:7-10).

Second speculative migration: About 2,700 years ago, the ten northern tribes of Israel were carried captive into the areas in or around the modern nation of Iran (the Assyrian Captivity). 700 years after the initial captivity (near the time of Jesus), the historian Josephus said the ten Israelite tribes had become an immense multitude in Asia (i.e. Parthian territory. See map below). Two hundred years after the life of Josephus, the Great Migration Period kicked off where enormous Asian populations migrated into Europe, eventually invading and settling Italiana, Britannia, and even Iberia.

Parthia's Greatest Extent

The large R Haplogroup population in India is also quite indicative of this second migration. The Parthian-Saka population that fled the Sassanids (Persians) into Europe must have fled to other friendly regions to the south and east as well (modern day Pakistan and India). Those peoples surrounding Parthia at the time of her collapse were friendly because they were of the same stock (Ephraimites) in many cases.

I’m drawing upon many different fields to build these connections. As I read the material that counters my ideas, I try to ingest it without having too much bias, but I readily admit I have some bias because I trust the Bible as an instrument of faith, prophecy, AND history. But you’ll rarely see the Macro-evolutionists admit where their atheistic bias is injected into their legitimately scientific findings.

For those who may be interested, here is a link to a list of many secular scientists who are skeptical of the Darwinian (Out of Africa) theory: A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism.

Next Page →