Things “One-Housers” hope You never find out!

If you don’t already know, a “One-Houser” is someone who denies that there remains a Two House/Two Kingdom reality of Israel in modern times. They view “the Jews” as exclusively representing all 12 tribes of Israel. Their world-view/paradigm is basically opposite to that of a “Two-Houser”, which is better defined here: Two House Theology (Reality) defined and defended.

So here are some things “One-Housers” hope you never find out (you’ll rarely ever hear them mention these things when they accuse Two-Housers of “lies”, “error”, “heresy”, and/or “bad exegesis“):

Please Note: “Two-Housers” will one day be “One-Housers” also, but that transition will only take place after the-Anointed Son of David (Ha-Mashaikh ben Dawid) unites both Houses into One House, or One Stick as Ezekiel 37 prophesies He will do in the Last Days. We are in the Last Days, so that transition and this battle of world-views will be over SOON! Halleluyah!!

Related Content:

The Case for a Creator (Intelligent Designer)


Part 1/7


Part 2/7


Part 3/7


Part 4/7


Part 5/7


Part 6/7


Part 7/7

Philosophical Mountain derived from a Genetic Pimple

The more I learn of human genetics, the more I grow to fundamentally despise racist terminology such as “white and black”, “Mongoloid, Negroid, and Caucasoid”. Yet, what perplexes me even more is how Population Geneticists (those who should know better) still use such terms even though most all of them readily admit humanity is more than 99.9% identical on every genetic level. What we use to categorize each other is almost entirely religious, social/cultural, and/or climatic/environmental induced “appearance” which is often confused with our ignorant assumptions regarding Human DNA.

What I’ve seen from studying sheep and sheeple, there is an enormous need to group off into like-ness cliques (i.e. White sheep, Black sheep). And once the larger group is semi-stabilized, further needs arise where deeper like-ness cliques are developed (i.e. Irish Catholics, Irish Protestants or Rwandan Hutu, Rwandan Tutsi). And sadly the cliques keep growing and variating (i.e. Rich and Poor, Rich and Ridiculously Rich). What is more disturbing, you’ll see small children behaving in similar patterns even before their parents get the chance to refine and radicalize this human tendency toward bigotry. Palestinian children are an example taken to the furthest extreme (their hate for the Jews is certainly not innate).

When I see similar Philosophical Mountaineering applied to “Ephraim” and the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel, it brings me further mental duress. It seems several diverse groups desire to claim exclusive rights to the House of Joseph… while they all seem to forget that Joseph was given a coat of “many colors” while Ephraim was promised to be the “fullness of the peoples/nations“. No matter how passionate and assertive British-Israelites or African-Israelites or Asian-Israelites become regarding their claims to Joseph, they are all one day going to look past skin tones and nose features… and come to grapple with and love their shared brotherhood of many colors.

Furthermore (even if you don’t agree with the Two House Teaching), hopefully you’ll begin to understand the realities of Human Exponential Population Growth and perceive how not long ago we were all on the same boat and had the same papa (Noah).

Related Content:

Comparing Romans 11:25 with Genesis 48:19 “the Fullness of the Nations/Peoples/Gentiles”

Genesis 48:19 “But his father refused and said, I know, my son, I know. He also becomes a people, and he also is great. And yet, his younger brother is greater than he, and his seed is to become the fulness of the nations [H1471 Goyim].”

Romans 11:25 “For I do not want you, brethren, to be ignorant of this mystery–so that you will not be wise in your own estimation–that a partial blindness [hardening] has happened to Israel until the fullness of the gentiles [G1484 Ethnos] has come in;”

Goyim (H1471) is sometimes translated into English as “Peoples”, “Nations”, or “Gentiles”.

Hellene (G1672), and more frequently, Ethnos (G1484) are translated into English as “Gentiles”. And most fascinatingly, the Septuagint (LXX) uses the Greek word “Ethnos” in Genesis 48:19 in the place of the Hebrew: “Goyim”.

Also compare: Romans 11:12; John 10:16; Luke 21:24.

Related Content:

Is the Earth 6000 Years Old?

Steven Collin’s has written a lengthy report to answer this question. He starts:

The answer to this question has caused a seismic divide between Christians and the modern scientific community. Both sides think that there is no possible way of reconciling their respective differences on this question. Many Christians, thinking that the Bible teaches that the earth and all life on it can be no more than 6,000 years old, answer this question in the affirmative. The scientific community, seeing physical evidence which indicates that the earth and physical Universe is much older than 6,000 years, answers this question in the negative. Additionally, scientists have heard so many Christians assert that the Bible teaches the earth is only 6,000 years old that they reject the Bible as unscientific because of that Christian assertion. Who is right? The answer may surprise you. I believe that each side has a lot of truth on its side, but they have been in disagreement because of a misunderstanding about what the Bible actually says on this subject.

To read the full article, go here: Is the Earth 6000 Years Old?

His reports describes an intriguing version of the “GAP Theory“, held by many Old Earth Creationists (opposed to Young Earth Creationists or YECists). In short, the theory indicates mankind is only about 6,000 years old, but the Earth and the Universe are much older (defined indefinitely by Scripture).

Because of my exposure to Young Earth Creationist David Hovind, I never really gave the GAP Theory much consideration, but Collins has given me much more to chew on. You can see a short snip bit of Hovind’s thoughts on the matter in Are there billions of years between verses one and two?

The Young Earth argument (against GAP Creationism) regarding “sin entering the world” is becoming less convincing to me, for Lucifer’s desire to exalt himself above the Most High was most certainly sin and likely occurred before Adam and Havah’s sin. Regardless, it seems preposterous to think Lucifer could have only sinned after the initial sin of man. Lucifer was not a man or hu-man. He himself was a mutually exclusive entity capable of making decisions which “miss the mark” of righteousness.

Next Page →