Radio-Carbon Dating, scientific idiocy

The origin estimation dates of all genetic haplogroups are largely obtained by Radiometric and/or Radiocarbon (Carbon-14) dating of ancient human remains and other archaeological materials, such as tools, pottery, etc. Unfortunately, Radiometric dating of any kind is enormously unreliable and consequently, the official estimation of 35,000 to 40,000 years is discarded in my Israelite Haplogroup (DNA) Hypotheses.

Radiometric dating techniques are a precious tool for evolutionists, particularly because they make what appear to be a frontal and successful attack on the credibility of the Scriptures and the Elohim of the Scriptures. Being able to accurately date archaeological materials is and should be a pursuit of science, but evolutionists who use radiometric dating systems transform too many assumptions into unquestioned constants which in turn have resultants that (of course) figure nicely into Evolutionism's "old earth" doctrine. Any reasonable person can see many of those time-zero assumptions can't possibly be known, especially not from a scriptural point of view. For example, the makeup of elements and radioactive elements within the atmosphere prior to the Great Flood is certainly not the same as it is today. In addition, there have been Calderic events which likely damaged the accuracy of dating resultants. Note: many of the larger Calderas, such as Yellowstone, likely erupted during the Great Flood.

To see a list of many misleading assumptions that radiometric dating methods are based upon, see 16 basic reasons why radioactive dating methods are notoriously unreliable.

In the very least, we should regard such dating methods with enormous suspicion, especially when it is zealously defended by individuals who insist on such religious ideals as: "Everything came from nothing" or "All matter was always present, but then started becoming more complex matters without any Intelligent intervention."