JewsAndJoes.com

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Articles History and 10-Israel 10 Proofs "the Jews" are from Judah

10 Proofs "the Jews" are from Judah

Print

Brief History:

Judah was one of the twelve sons of Jacob (Israel). His tribe eventually became one of the more important tribes of the twelve for it became the tribe of Kings (Genesis 49:10; Psalm 60:7; 108:8) of which David, Solomon, and even Yeshua (Jesus) came. After King Solomon's reign, the United Kingdom of Israel was divided into two kingdoms, sometimes called Israel (Joseph) and Judah respectively. The Southern Israelite Kingdom of Judah did not consist of only the tribe of Judah, but also remnants of Benjamin and likely the bulk of Levi (Levi was also scattered in the midst of the northern tribes).

See History and Timeline of Israel and Judah for more detail.

The 10 Proofs:

  1. The first century historian Flavius Josephus records the ten tribes of Israel as an "immense multitude" remaining "beyond the Euphrates River" (Antiquities of the Jews - Book XI Ch. 5), while "the Jews", the two tribes in the Land of Israel still, were "controlled by the Romans". The House of Judah (Jew-dah) was the group who historically returned from Babylonia, from their Babylonian Captivity.
  2. In Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 110b, Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Eliezer (c.117-138 C.E.), disagreed about the eventual return of 10-Israel, indicating "the Jews" of the 2nd Century C.E. were not representative of all twelve tribes, but instead, they represented the Kingdom of Judah primarily.
  3. Many contemporary rabbis and Talmudic scholars have indicated the Jews predominantly represent a descendant population of the Ancient Kingdom of Judah.“The captives of Israel exiled beyond the Euphrates did not return as a whole to Palestine along with their brethren the captives of Judah; at least there is no mention made of this event in the documents at our disposal… In fact, the return of the ten tribes was one of the great promises of the Prophets, and the advent of the Messiah is therefore necessarily identified with the epoch of their redemption.” -D.A. Neubauer [Ref. Jewish Quarterly Review, Vol. I -1888, p. 15,17]
    Rabbi Rafael Eisenberg believed the majority opinion of the ancient Sages was this: ...the Ten Tribes which disappeared in Assyria shall return. Their decision is quoted in the Tosefta, ... “As it is this day” is explained as meaning that “if their deeds remain as they were this day, they will not return. On the other hand, if they are not—that is, if they have repented for and corrected their actions—they will return.” (see the article: Will the Lost Tribes Return? An Analysis of the Lost Tribes in Rabbinic Literature)
  4. The modern "Jewish" nation of Israel traces its history back to the Babylonian Captivity of JEW-dah! The Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs says this: "The exile to Babylonia, which followed the destruction of the First Temple (586 BCE), marked the beginning of the Jewish Diaspora." (see the MFA timeline) WAIT! Did you catch that? The Israeli Jews call Babylon their “FIRST EXILE”. But HOLD ON! The First Israelite Exile happened more than a hundred years earlier with the Assyrian Captivity! What is amiss here? Jewish scholars simply know the Assyrian Captivity was NOT a Jewish captivity, but it was the captivity of the Ancient Northern Kingdom, who were Hebrew, but they were NOT "Jewish". Consider also another official Israeli government "Jewish History" timeline: Jewish Agency for Israel (Aliyah.org).
    Israeli officials are not hiding the two-house reality. They simply are not volunteering all the pieces to the puzzle. Yet, it is primarily "One-Houser" Messianic Jewish teachers who cannot stomach it for their own theological tReasons. That's right: "treasons"! Family treason! The biblical record plainly displays the two house reality in history and in End-Time/future events. But the loyalty of some "teachers" is not founded on reality. It is founded on their own theological doctrinal paradigm which must turn a blind eye to the biblical and historical record of Israel and Judah (which just happens to be a massively importafnt reality in the Last Days). This is paramount to family treason because they are basically ignoring a brother that the Father would otherwise have them search for and rescue (consider the older brother's behavior toward his lost younger brother in the Prodigal Son parable of Luke 15).
  5. 'On Friday, May 14, 1948, in Tel Aviv, the Jews were poised to declare their new nation at 6:00 p.m., Washington time. Truman and Clifford expected the new state to be called “Judea.”' -Newsweek Web Exclusive - From Presidential Courage: Brave Leaders and How They Changed America 1789-1989 by Michael Beschloss.
    Why did President Truman and his White House counsel, Clark Clifford, think the Jewish nation would be named "Judea"? They simply knew that most modern Jews predominantly trace their traditional lineage back to Benjamin, Judah, or Levi (the tribes of the Southern Kingdom of Judah), not to the House of Joseph (10-Israel). The nation was called "Judea" by the Babylonians, by the Romans, and by many other ancient empires. Why would their be any anticipation for the name "Israel" to be used when the Jewish state would be more properly and fittingly represents ancient Judea? If nothing else, the misnaming effectively hid 10-Israel's existence, especially to the mainstream Christian Church.

  6. It is traditionally believed the ancient tribe of Judah would always go into battle before the other tribes (see Judges 1:2 and 20:18). And interestingly, the Jews of Judah returned to the Land of Israel first (early last century) and everyone knows it has been nothing but a battle for them ever since, even before 1948 and the numerous Arab-Israeli Wars that followed. In truth, the Israeli Jews are a "Lion" the whole Middle East is fearful to go to war with (even after the occasional liberal leader weakens Judah in the eyes of Muslim extremists like Hezbollah and Hamas ).
  7. Ancient Jewish tradition forbids all Jews from speaking the Divine Name of the Creator and the Prophet Jeremiah (sent to the Kingdom of Judah before her captivity) foretold the Divine Name would be removed from Judah’s mouth. See Jeremiah 44:26 where it says, “Therefore hear the word of יהוה, all Judah who are dwelling in the land of Mitsrayim, ‘See, I have sworn by My great Name,’ declares יהוה, ‘My Name shall no longer be called upon by the mouth of any man of Judah in all the land of Mitsrayim, saying, “As the Master יהוה lives...”
  8. The Prophets Ezra and Nehemiah succinctly numbered the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and Levi as those who returned from the Babylonian Captivity. The other tribes were not mentioned (read Ezra and Nehemiah for yourself). Even so, some Israelites likely returned later from the Assyrian Captivity, such as the Asherite prophetess of Luke 2:36, but many other factors indicate NO LARGE representation ever returned. Remnants undoubtedly did so, but that does not implicate 10-Israel having had returned in any significant population move. 
  9. The people commonly known as "the Jews" never became a "multitude of nations", but Ephraim of the Northern Kingdom of Israel was promised to become so (Genesis 48:19). Judah was simply not promised “multitudes” or "nations", but he was promised the "scepter" and “Kings” (Genesis 49:10). Ulltimately it was/is Messiah Yeshua, descending from the House of David of the House of Judah who has fulfilled that promise.
  10. And finally. If the people known today as “the Jews” are representative of all twelve tribes of Israel, meaning the descendant peoples of both Israelite Kingdoms who were divided in antiquity (as many One-Housers would have us to believe), then how does one explain the “Last Days” two stick prophecy of Ezekiel 37? The whole book of Ezekiel (indeed much of the Prophets) would simply be confused and discombobulated if the above "if" statements were a reality.

With the 10 Reasons above, the two-house reality should be more easily discerned, unless a person has a biased and emotionally charged reason not to see it and/or maybe being intellectually lazy and/or just does not care. Yet, maybe the Elohim of Israel is the ultimate Culprit in the matter of blindness and/or close-mindedness. Maybe He has deliberately blinded the peoples of Ephraim/10-Israel and the rest of the world until His prerequiste plans are accomplised... until the "fullness of the peoples have come in" and it is time for His Prodigal Son to "come to himself" (Luke 15:17). Unfortunately, if Luke 15 is a guide, it seems that the Prodigal does come home until after he goes through a great deal of "trouble".  

Shalom Aleichem to both Houses and may they eventually become One in the hand of ha-Mashiakh (the-Annointed)!

 
Related Content:

 

Last Updated on Monday, 24 August 2009 18:51  
Comments (2)
Comment: I just have two problems with this being true
1 Saturday, 12 December 2009 14:36
GuestfromGoogle
  1. Is there any possibility for Israel then to be any where OTHER than
    beyond the Euphrates because If Judah already returned home then who
    are the Falasha Jews in Ethiopia (Cush)?
  2. I as a gentile christian have those same sentiments toward the state
    of Israel but I know my family history and I am not genetically
    descended from the line of Abraham (I'm Ethiopian).
Response: I just have two problems with this being true
2 Saturday, 12 December 2009 21:46
Hanok

When you say "Israel" in your first point, are you speaking of 10-Israel or Judah (and Israeli Jews)?

It should be understood that not ALL of Judah has returned to the Land, now modernly called "Israel". Much of Judah still lives in the United States of America (who I consider Daughter Babylon). 10-Israelites are also in the midst of the United States. Jeremiah 50 indicates both Judah and 10-Israel would be in Daughter Babylon when she is destroyed. They will then leave weeping and looking for Zion.

Furthermore, descendants of the House of Judah and the House of Israel can be found all over the Middle East... even today. Many of them actually "think" they are Arab and/or Muslim.... or Persian... or Turkish... or Pakistani, etc...  

10-Israelites have also converted to Judaism (Jewdaism) in antiquity and in modern times. So a sub-segment of 10-Israelites are hiding in plain view within the genetic Jewish population (y-Haplogroup R most notably). 

The Falasha Jews are controversial of course... just like the entire subject of Judah and 10-Israel is controversial. Some think the Falasha descend from Danites. Some think they descend from Judah and/or one of Solomon's sons. Some think they descend from Levites. Some think they were non-Israelite Jewish converts. Some think they were Christian converts who embraced many Jewish-like traditions. Some think they are mixture of all of the above.

We don't really know for sure. Even in the realm of genetics, we are uncertain of the realities. Most all of the 'authorities' who interpret the genetic data are sold out to the Primary Axiom of Darwinism (and its variants) and they interpret everything from an "Out of Africa" and "extremely old humanity" paradigm. 

What we do know is that the world (both new and ancient) is a much smaller place than we are generally allowed to perceive from the Darwinist cave-man worldview. The ancients traveled and mixed much more extensively than most of us are willing to give them credit for. They were NOT Geico insecure cave-men retards.

In regards, to your second point. Your family ancestry consists of thousands and thousands of branches of humanity that mixed and mingled in one of the most culturally unstable regions of the ancient world. How can you possibly "know" with complete certainty some of your ancestors do not descend from Abraham? And even if you aren't connected to Abraham physically, of course there is nothing wrong with being drawn to Israel or Judah and/or their El and His Ways.

Caleb and Ruth are two notable examples of non-Israelites being drawn to the El of Abraham, Isaak, and Jacob. Their and other non-Israelite mixing only contributes to the genetic mystery that disparate world-views are trying to unravel.

Add your comment

Your name:
Your website:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):


Adam's Chart of History: A Timeline Chronology of Ancient, Modern, and Biblical History (accordion-style fold-out)
Adams's Chart of History: A Chronology of Ancient, Modern, and Biblical History

 


Who's Online

We have 89 guests online

Statistics

Content View Hits : 244974